11 Comments
User's avatar
peter@speciesprotection.com's avatar

Yet another tragic day for whales. How is it possible that one man's obsession with killing whales, enabled by his wealth, is allowed to continue with this shameful pursuit?

Blue America's avatar

Despicable

Charles Tellier's avatar

It is always possible to revoke a license when it is no longer in the public interest and the government has the evidence to prove this if there is a legal challenge. And at worst, reinstate it when it's too late or pay damages. I can't imagine the company can prove it would cause of massive financial damage given there is very little, if any, business sense for whale hunting as no-one buys the meat or any other byproduct anymore.

Bob's avatar

Legalistic excuses do not save whales.

Charles Tellier's avatar

Yes, that was my point. The government could have taken a different route and prevented this.

Sandy Macfarlane's avatar

Thank you, Luke, for your summary of the events taking place since last week. I have been following the news, trying to understand the complex history to gain some clarity of how this action transpired. Your comments have helped me to understand some of the issues and I am grateful.

Bob's avatar

Another body blow to nature, to ocean life and, all life.

Simon Morice's avatar

Didn't Sea Shepherd, under Paul Watson, sink half the Icelandic whaling fleet in 1986? Watson did say that if Lawson started up again he'd be there to get in their way...

Penelope Conlan's avatar

Sad. You didn’t mention the Faroe Islands’ annual hunt. Have they stopped?

Luke McMillan's avatar

They haven’t, but technically it’s not commercial whaling. Hundreds have already been killed this summer already.

Penelope Conlan's avatar

In this day and age their ancient tradition is not necessary or relevant. Thanks for waking me up.